![]() The study followed adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 25 to 39.9 for 2 years. The POUNDS LOST study used a computerized tracking system to test the effectiveness of four macronutrient diets for weight loss. The researchers concluded that there was no significant difference between the two diets. The average weight loss was 5.3 kilograms (kg) for the low fat diet and 6 kg for the low carb diet. Scientists are continuously attempting to find out how macronutrients affect a person’s health and weight.įor example, the researchers behind the DIETFITS study randomly allocated adults to either a healthful low fat diet or a healthful low carb diet.Īfter a year, the scientists assessed how much weight the participants had lost. ![]() Some popular diets provide recipes so that a person can easily make meals that stick to the diet’s macronutrient ratios. People can track their macronutrient intake using fitness and diet apps. However, it may also have negative implications for cardiovascular health. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding whether or not this diet is beneficial for the general population.Ī 2018 review indicated that this diet can lower blood glucose, which may be helpful in diabetes and for overall health. The ketogenic, or keto, diet has gained popularity in recent years. People do not usually track micronutrients in these diets, so they may wish to take note of which vitamins and minerals they need according to guidelines and make sure that they are including these. Some popular diets that use this method include:Įach diet has its own rules regarding the quantity or percentage of macronutrients a person should eat. Advocates of such diets claim that this is an effective way for people to lose weight, reduce fat, or gain muscle. If not, for the same price, you can buy a Minolta DiMage Elite 5400 lens and have one of the highest performing 1.5x - 3x lenses available at any price. A detailed review of the Minolta Elite 5400 lens is available here on Closeuphotography.Some diets focus on the amount of macronutrients a person consumes, rather than just the calories. If you need an iris diaphragm and don't mind seeing CAs, I would recommend the Laowa 60m f/2.8 2:1 lens. Some of these manufacturers have a extremely large variation in performance from sample to sample. From what I know about the lens industry thats the gamble when you buy from smaller manufacturers. This test is also a great example of why you should test your lenses, my Oshiro 60mm is clearly defective. After seeing the results I really doubt they are clones. The test results were a surprise, I expected the performance to be a lot closer between the Laowa and the Oshiro. The sharpness of the Laowa was impressive, it beats the MP-E in some areas, but at the same time the lack of CA suppression is a disappointment. For consistency all of images were made on a MM-11 microscope stand with two Godox TT-350 flash units and X1T wireless trigger.Ĭlick on any image below to launch a new window with a larger version. You can right click, or two-finger click with a Mac and select the open in a new tab or new window options. The images were made at sharpest aperture for each lens. ![]() This is the full un-cropped area at 2x, the blue outlines are the crop areas used in the comparisons.Īll of the images below are from a single file and were chosen out of a stack of images. ![]() Comparing the Oshiro against the Laowa at 2X All of the images shown here are single files. All images were shot as a single RAW files and processed in PS CC with all noise reduction and lens correction turned off, all settings were zeroed out (true zero) and the same settings were used for all of the images. Vertical stand: Nikon MM-11 with a Nikon focus blockĪ series of images was shot with each lens in 10 micron steps, and the sharpest image was chosen for center, edge, and corner in Photoshop at 100% actual pixel view. 3.92 micron sensor pitchįlash: Godox TT350s wireless flash x 2 with one Godox X1s 2.4G wireless flash transmitter The best part of working with wafers is they will not warp or change shape in the middle of a test, they are perfectly flat and they stay flat.Ĭamera: Sony α6300, model # ILCE-6300, also known as: A6300 Nothing beats a wafer for flat ultra-fine details, the geometrical patterns are a few microns (μm) down into the nano-meter (mµ) range. Test Set-upįor this test I chose a 300 mm (12 inch) silicon wafer with great patterns. There are solutions, this is my Sony A6300 with a Sigma MC-11 EOS to E-mount adapter, with a Small Rig MC-11 tripod adapter attached to a generic quick release plate. The lack of the tripod collar on both lenses makes the handling in the field less convenient. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |